by Mike Jenkins at tampafp.com
A top Department of Justice (DOJ) official urged Congress Tuesday to renew a heavily criticized warrantless surveillance law, citing the potential consequences of the 9/11-era law expiring.
“What keeps me up at night is thinking about what will happen if we fail to renew Section 702 of FISA [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act],” Assistant Attorney General For National Security Matthew Olsen said in remarks at the Brookings Institution.
The law, known as Section 702, is a key provision under the FISA Amendments Act and was created in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks to obtain communications from targeted foreigners and in some cases, American citizens who have spoken with foreigners of interest.
DOJ has made errors with the program in the past, which have eroded public trust, Olesen said. “Many of those mistakes resulted from misunderstandings by FBI personnel about the rules governing U.S. person queries.”
On Feb. 28, the Biden administration released a statement supporting reauthorizing Section 702.
While it can violate privacy and be misused, Section 702 is “a vital intelligence collection authority” and “a cornerstone of U.S. national security,” National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan said in a statement.
Sullivan said that it protects Americans everyday and is necessary to adequately address threats from China, Russia, and others who want to harm American infrastructure.
Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines and Attorney General Merrick Garland released a joint letter on Tuesday urging Democratic and Republican congressional leaders in the House and Senate to renew the Section 702 authorities, according to The Washington Examiner.
Sullivan said that it protects Americans everyday and is necessary to adequately address threats from China, Russia, and others who want to harm American infrastructure.
“Section 702 has faced a sunset twice in the past decade. Both times Congress voted to reauthorize it, with strong bipartisan support,” Olsen said. “While 702 is more essential than ever before, the broad, bipartisan consensus supporting this, and other national security authorities, has frayed in recent years.”